aoc - Advent of Code

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age
*	Day 20 pt1	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-20
\|
*	Trying new things (not working)	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-20
\|
*	Enable instruction cache	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-20
\|
*	Correct input	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-20
\|
*	Add thoughts for d18	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-18
\|
*	More day 18 WIP	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-18
\|
*	Implement LCM and remove coverage	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-18
\| \| \| \|	Runtime is at 6 seconds with pypy oof.
*	WIP Day 18	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-18
\|
*	Rename 2019	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\|
*	Fix SIG_*-resets	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\|
*	Remove python3.8-isms	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\|
*	Day 17 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\| \| \| \|	Also skip d16 when calling from main
*	Day 17 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Kinda let-down by the fact that a) you could follow the scaffold without turning at the intersections b) finding the routines by hand was a viable solution.
*	WIP Day 17 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-17
\| \| \| \| \|	Can solve part 1 and find a naive instruction-set which passes all points.
*	Reformat main	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\|
*	Day 16 call from main	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\| \| \| \|	Runtime is ~12 seconds per part
*	Day 14 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\|
*	Day 16 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\| \| \| \|	Runtime is shit, about 20-30 seconds on a ryzen 2600
*	WIP Day 14 (working pt1)	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\|
*	Cleanup 15 and visualize	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\|
*	Day 15 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-16
\|
*	Minor changes d15 (still not working)	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-15
\|
*	Day 15 py (not working)	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-15
\| \| \| \|	oof
*	Minor refactor	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-15
\|
*	Refactor (and faster?) intcode and day 9+13	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-14
\|
*	Faster day 12 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-13
\|
*	Remove test-cases	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-13
\|
*	Minor speed-ups	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-13
\|
*	Day 13 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-13
\|
*	Day 12 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-13
\|
*	Day 12 part 1 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-12
\|
*	Fix output	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-11
\|
*	Initial animation	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-11
\| \| \| \|	Run with 'python d11.py'
*	Refactor and add timing/profiling day 11	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-11
\|
*	Day 11 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-11
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	I found a bug in my intcode-implementation which day 9 didn't catch. To solve it, I switched the memory from my past hybrid solution (initial memory as a list and extra memory as a dict) to a 100% dict-solution. I am not entirely sure why it didn't work before since Computer.write() checks if the write-position is outside the length, unless it got a negative address. It seems like dict is slower than list for memory so I might try to re-implement lists for (initial) memory later.
*	Visualize day 10	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-10
\|
*	Faster day 4	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-10
\|
*	Refactor and timings day 10	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-10
\|
*	Day 10 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-10
\|
*	Fix output	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-09
\|
*	Additional timing-stats	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-09
\|
*	Fix ordering of profile and print	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-09
\|
*	Add profiling and timing day 9	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-09
\|
*	Day 9 py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-09
\|
*	Add timer	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|
*	Print answer	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|
*	Add cProfiler	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|
*	Refactor day 4	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|
*	AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|
*	Refactor and create main.py	Gustav Sörnäs	2019-12-08
\|